It appears the Trump administration is doing no higher getting its story straight about Social Safety than managing the agency itself. The president has said many times, with out qualifiers, that he’s “not going to the touch Social Safety.” However virtually each day, others on his crew are saying in any other case — and in contrast to the president, they’re including qualifiers and contingencies and situations through which Social Safety would certainly be touched.
Workforce Trump appears to have concluded that Social Safety is no longer the “third rail of American politics” — that they’ll contact it and survive. It is going to be as much as voters to show them flawed.
The administration is providing a discount, designed to reduce blowback because it weakens Social Safety: We are going to shield what older People are actually getting, they wink, if these People don’t make a fuss about reducing future advantages for the younger and the undeserving.
We are able to see a hint of that strategy in the March 17 statement from Karoline Leavitt, the president’s press secretary, when she stated, “Any American receiving Social Safety advantages will proceed to obtain them.”
Then, on March 21, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick recommended that anybody complaining about an interruption of their Social Safety advantages should be a “fraudster.” Fraudsters, Lutnick noticed, “at all times make … the loudest noise, screaming, yelling, and complaining,” To the murmured settlement of his podcast host, Lutnick added, “Anybody whose been in a fee system is aware of the simplest approach to discover a fraudster is to cease funds and pay attention.”
There you might have it — a framing that permits Lutnick and his colleagues within the Trump administration to say they don’t intend to chop Social Safety whereas devising plans to undermine it and shake the religion of the millions of Americans who depend on it.
A method to take action is to make coping with the Social Safety Administration as painful as coping with the Division of Motor Autos or your native cable tv supplier.
Robert Kuttner, co-founder of The American Prospect, calls it “pure mischief, meant to weaken a broadly appreciated and environment friendly public system that Elon Musk has disparaged as a Ponzi scheme.” Doing so will flip Social Safety right into a “smooth goal” by tarnishing its fame and getting the general public prepared once they eventually talk about privatizing Social Security.
And final month, Frank Bisignano, nominated to move the Social Safety Administration, echoed President Trump’s March 4 speech to Congress, the place he went on at size about “surprising ranges of incompetence and possible fraud within the Social Safety program for our seniors.” Whereas Bisignano, describing himself as “essentially a DOGE particular person,” stated his “goal is not to the touch advantages … there’s going to be fraud, waste and abuse in there.”
These warnings are the administration’s manner of adjusting how People consider Social Safety — not as an earned profit program however as part of the welfare system.
Historians remind us that the New Sellers who created Social Safety fought laborious in opposition to such a portrait. They succeeded by connecting it to a longstanding American dedication to catastrophe aid, with the catastrophe being aged folks residing in distress. Trump and his allies need to undo that legacy and affiliate Social Safety with all of the detrimental connotations that accompany being on welfare— a contemporary model of Ronald Reagan’s attack on “welfare queens” that blames unlawful immigrants for society’s ills.
Trump highlighted that connection all through final yr’s presidential marketing campaign, blaming Democrats for endangering Social Safety and Medicare “by permitting the INVASION OF THE MIGRANTS.”
That’s the reason, on the finish of his remarks about Social Safety throughout his podcast interview, Lutnick promised that the administration wouldn’t “take one penny from somebody who deserves Social Safety.” The American folks shouldn’t take his phrase for it.
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst School.
Add comment